ASSESSMENT OF DROUGHT PROCESS WITH INTEGRATED MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION-MAKING METHODS
نویسندگان
چکیده
This study aimed to prioritize the factors affecting drought, which is an important issue for sustainability of agricultural production, and classify by severity dry periods. An integrated decision model based on multi-criteria making (MCDM) techniques, Entropy, TOPSIS (Technique Order Preference Similarity Ideal Solution) MAUT (Multi Attribute Utility Theory) methods, was presented in study. The proposed applied a numerical case determine drought periods, considering some climatic parameters between 1971 2019 Kırşehir province. Entropy-weighted results relative methods indicated 17 years within last 49 years, classified three different levels as weak, moderate severe. Ten out were weakly (20.41%), 6 them (12.24%), 1 year serious (2.04%). method showed that 11 weak (22.45%), 5 (10.20%) revealed use models such can support analysis combating fruit growing using long-term factors.
منابع مشابه
An AHP-Delphi Multi-Criteria Decision Making Model with Application to Environmental Decision-Making
متن کامل
An Evaluation of Health Hazards Based on Multi Criteria Decision Making Process
Introduction: Health care workers are exposed to vast number of occupational hazards. According to the importance of protecting these valuable workforces, it is necessary to assess various deleterious factors in their career to make right decisions in dealing with these situations. Methods and Materials: In this study, first, all the hazards of different units of a treatment center were invest...
متن کاملEvaluation of recommender systems: A multi-criteria decision making approach
The evaluation and selection of recommender systems is a difficult decision making process. This difficulty is partially due to the large diversity of published evaluation criteria in addition to lack of standardized methods of evaluation. As such, a systematic methodology is needed that explicitly considers multiple, possibly conflicting metrics and assists decision makers to evaluate and find...
متن کاملRisk management in urban tunnels using methods of game theory and multi-criteria decision-making
In general, underground spaces are associated with high risks because of their high uncertainty in geotechnical environments. Since most accidents and incidents in these structures are often associated with uncertainty, the development of risk analysis and management methods and prevention of accidents are essential. A deeper recognition of the factors affecting the implementation process can p...
متن کاملThe place of AHP method among Multi Criteria Decision Making methods in forest management
As the name implies, Multi Criteria Decision Making Methods (MCDMs) is a decision making tool that capable the selection of the most preferred choice in a context where several criteria apply simultaneously. Primary purpose of this study is to examine the status of Multi Criteria Decision Making Methods (MCDMs) in forest management. The study also aims to evaluate the strengths and weaknesses ...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Mu?la journal of science and technology
سال: 2021
ISSN: ['2149-3596']
DOI: https://doi.org/10.22531/muglajsci.836438